Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ÿ¼®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¿¬±¸

A RADIOLOGIC STUDY OF SALIVARY STONES

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1986³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.93 ~ 102
Á¶È¿¼®, ±èÁ¾¹è,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶È¿¼® (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
±èÁ¾¹è (  ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼±°ú¿¡¼­ Åë»óÀû¹æ»ç¼±ÃÔ¿µ°ú Ÿ¾×¼±Á¶¿µ¼ú·Î Ÿ¼®ÁõÀ¸·Î
Áø´Ü¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ 50¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Á¶»çÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1) ¾ÇÇϼ± Ÿ¼®Áõ ȯÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 38.6¼¼, ÀÌÇϼ± Ÿ¼®Áõ ȯÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ¿¬·ÉÀº 39.2¼¼ÀÌ
¾úÀ¸¸ç ¼ºº°ºÐÆ÷´Â ³²ÀÚ°¡ 29¸í (58.0%), ¿©ÀÚ°¡ 21¸í (42.0%)À¸·Î ³²ÀÚ°¡ ¾à°£ ´õ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
2) Ÿ¼®Áõ ȯÀÚ 50¸íÁß ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ È¯ÀÚ´Â 41¸íÀ¸·Î 82.0%, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ È¯ÀÚ´Â
9¸íÀ¸·Î 18%À̾ú´Ù.
3) 50¸íÀÇ Å¸¼®Áõ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÈ Ÿ¼®¼ö´Â ÃÑ 80°³·Î ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡ 62°³, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡ 18°³°¡
¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ß»ýÀ§Ä¡´Â ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡¼­´Â µµ°ü³»¿¡ 33°³ (53.2%), hilum¿¡ 25°³ (40.3%), ½ÇÁú
³»¿¡ 4°³ (6.5%)°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡¼­´Â µµ°ü³»¿¡ 5°³ (50.0%), ½ÇÁú¿¡ 5°³(27.8%),
hilum¿¡ 4°³ (22.2%)°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù
4) ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ Å¸¼®Áß ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼ºÀÌ 45°³ (75.8%), ¹æ»ç¼±Åõ°ú¼ºÀÌ 17°³ (24.2%)
À̾ú°í, ÀÌÇϼ±ÀÇ °æ¿ì ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼º Ÿ¼®ÀÌ 12°³ (66.7%) ¹æ»ç¼±Åõ°ú¼º Ÿ¼®ÀÌ 6°³
(33.3%)À̾ú´Ù.
5) ´Ü¹ß¼º Ÿ¼®Àº ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡¼­ 30Áõ·Ê·Î 73.2%, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡¼­´Â 6Áõ·Ê·Î 66.7%À̾ú°í, ´Ù¹ß
¼º Ÿ¼®Àº ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡¼­ 11Áõ·Ê·Î 26.8%, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡¼­´Â 3Áõ·Ê ·Î 33.3%ÀÌ ¾ú´Ù.
6) Ÿ¼®ÀÇ ÇüÅ´ ¾ÇÇϼ±, ÀÌÇϼ± ¸ðµÎ ¿øÇüÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í(43.8%), ±× ´ÙÀ½ÀÌ ³­¿øÇü
(27.5%), ºÒ±ÔÄ¢Çü (21.3%), ¿øÅëÇü (7.5%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
7) Ÿ¼®ÀÌ Á¸Àç½Ã ¾ÇÇϼ±¿¡¼­ 58.5%, ÀÌÇϼ±¿¡¼­ 66.1%ÀÇ µµ°ü°ú ½ÇÁú¿¡ ¿°ÁõÀ» ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ
ÀûÀ¸·Î º¸¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The author examined fifty cases of sialolithiasis diagnosed in the Dept. of Oral
Radiology in SNUH by conventional radiography and sialography, and analyzed patient's
age, sex, location, radiodensity, numbers, shapes, and relation with ducts and
parenchymas.
The results of this study were as follows:
1. The average age of patients was 38.6 years in submandibular sialolithiasis, and 39.2
years in parotid sialolithiasis.
2. There was slightly higher incidence in males (58.0%) than in females (42.0%).
3. Salivary stones were found to be much more in the submandibular gland and duct
(82.0%) than in the parotid gland and duct (18.0%).
4. Of 62 submandibular salivary stones, 33 (53.2%) occurred in the main duct, 25
(40.3%) occurred in the hilum, and 4 (6.5%) occurred in the parenchyma.
Of 18 parotid salivary stones, 9(50.0%) occurred in the main duct, 5(27.8%) occurred
in the parenchyma, and 4(22.2%) occurred in the hilum.
5. Of the submandibular salivary stones, the number of radiopaque type was 45
(75.8%), and the number of radiolucent type was 17 (24.2%).
Of the parotid salivary stones, the number of radiopaque type was 12 (66.7%), and
the number of radiolucent type was 6 (33.3%).
6. The single type was 30 cases (73.2%) in submandibular gland, 6 cases (66.7%) in
parotid gland, and the multiple type was 11 cases (26.8%) in submandibular gland, and 3
cases (33.3%) in parotid gland.
7. Round shape was 35 cases (43.8%), ovoid shape was 22 cases (27.5%), irregular
shape was 17 cases (21.3%), and cylindrical shape was 6 cases (7.5%).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸